|
The pictures
on this page was taken solely with Leica 180 mm Elmarit-R
f:2.8 series I.
This is a lens from 1967 that I had for two weeks and tested.
I my opinion not better than any other brand; it doesn't have
the qualities that normally distinguish a Leica lens. And
it is very heavy to hold, making it hard to make sharp pictures
handheld.
The new 180 mm APO-Elmarit-R f. 2.8 is the lens one should
go for.
At the beach house, July 2003.
Leica
R4 with 180
mm Elmarti-R/2.8
[Series I from 1967] @ f. 5.6, Fuji Velvia 50 (scanned on
Nikon Coolscan IV).
At the beach house, July 2003.
Leica R4 with 180
mm Elmarti-R/2.8
[Series I from 1967] @ f. 5.6, Fuji Velvia 50 (scanned on
Nikon Coolscan IV).
At the beach house, July 2003.
Leica R4 with 180
mm Elmarti-R/2.8
[Series I from 1967] @ f. 4.0, Fuji Velvia 50 (scanned on
Nikon Coolscan IV).
For
comparison here is some pictures made with the Nikkor
135/2.8. Not as good quality as the Leica 180 mm
but still not that big a difference:
Oliver dancing break-dance at the beach house,
July 2003.
Nikon F3 HP with 135
mm Nikkor/2.8
@ f. 5.6, Fuji Velvia 50 (scanned on Nikon Coolscan IV).
Caroline & Oliver at the beach house,
July 2003.
Nikon F3 HP with 135
mm Nikkor/2.8
@ f. 8.0, Fuji Velvia 50 (scanned on Nikon Coolscan IV).
|
